Berlinale 2004
presented an overwhelmingly serious program that festival director
Dieter Kosslick explained recognizes film as “…an art
form that holds a mirror up to reality; that examines the real in
retrospect, that is able to reflect upon real events and cry out in
condemnation.” But how much influence do filmmakers have in
defining reality, particularly when the medium is a documentary?
In the United
States, Americans saw the Iraqi war unfold as pre-sented by embedded
reporters – people who trained and traveled with American military.
Live action pictures showed spectacular bomb raids with refer-ences
to the “Shock and Awe” campaign of coalition forces. Soldiers
marched into Baghdad, prisoners were rescued, and statutes to Saddam
Hussein were toppled by the triumphant liber-ators. In addition, the
military U.S. Central Command (CentCom) set up a communications center
in Doha, Qatar, miles away from the actual fighting, for the purpose
of regular briefings for major news media. An Egyptian-American director,
Jehane Noujaim, traveled to the CentCom communications
post in Qatar to witness how the news media went about the business
of reporting war. In her film Control Room,
she focuses on Qatari-based Al-Jazeera, an Arab news organization
labeled as propagandist by the Bush administration.
Sameer
Khader, a senior producer for Al-Jazeera, is against the Bush policy
in Iraq but voices an appreciation for American values and a desire
to move to the United States and “exchange the Arab nightmare
for the American dream.” He is shown berating an employee for
arranging a live interview with a person who turns out to be an extremist
with wild unsubstantiated opinions about the Bush administration.
Translators broadcast press conferences from the White House live,
making faces to express their disbelief but nevertheless completing
the translation. Another producer for Al-Jazeera, Deema Khatib, describes
American war coverage as the most incredible piece of theater she
has ever seen. One example is the toppling of the statute of Saddam
Hussein led by American soldiers. As the Al-Jazeera team watches the
clip of a group of men rushing to the square, comments challenge whether
the men are even Iraqis because of their accent and question why they
appear to be around the same age; they question where all the other
people are and why did one man happen to have an Iraqi flag from before
Saddam’s reign?
Noujaim follows
the progress of the war by interviewing Lt. Josh Rushing, press officer
for Central Command. Rushing used to work in Hollywood negotiating
script content to ensure the U.S. military was portrayed favorably
in films. An aspiring actor, he appears very good at his job. Seemingly
open-minded, Rushing debates American policies with Al-Jazeera journalists,
but believes that the news station portrays America inaccurately.
She also meets with Tom Mintier of CNN who is outraged by the lack
of accurate information released by CentCom and with David Shuster
of NBC who believes in the Western press and constantly clashes with
Deema Khatib.
Featured in Noujaim’s
interviews is Hassan Ibrahim, a journalist for Al-Jazeera from Sudan
who went to school with Osama bin Laden, attended American universities
and once headed the BBC Arab News Service. He believes Al-Jazeera
is the only free news station in the Middle East. Passionately against
the war in Iraq and the American presence in the Middle East, he praises
the U.S. Constitution and hopes the American people will stop the
madness of the Bush administration. Al-Jazeera aired tapes of American
prisoners of war and dead American soldiers as well as Iraqi civilian
casualties, all images that were barred from American broadcasts.
Reports in the U.S. condemned Al-Jazeera for the broadcasts.
An Al-Jazeera journalist
sits among sandbags on top of the building that houses the headquarters
of Al-Jazeera in Baghdad. American bombers circle overhead. Ten minutes
later, the journalist is killed by American bombs. On that same day,
two other Arab news media headquarters in Baghdad are also bombed,
killing another two journalists. Those are the facts. Why it happened
can be considered either fact or fiction, depending on the perspective
of the journalist or viewer, but the position of Noujaim is made clear.
One of the fascinating
aspects of Control Room is the effort to compare and contrast an American
with an Arab perspective by analyzing news events. A real impact on
these perspectives is made by how the interviews and news events are
edited down to just 84 minutes.
Another
documentary, Neverland: The Rise and Fall of the Symbionese
Liberation Army, takes a frank look at how the media
itself impacts the story. In Neverland, director Robert
Stone studies the rise of the Symbionese Liberation Army
(SLA), the first domestic terrorist cell in the U.S. to become a media
sensation. Interspersed among actual newsreels from television archives
are images of Robin Hood, Bonnie and Clyde and Che Guevara –
icons of the SLA members. Russ Little, one of the founders of the
SLA, explains how he grew up watching shows like Robin Hood
where heroes fought valiantly against an oppressive government. Little
railed against the government of Tricky Dicky Nixon and U.S. aggression
in Vietnam. Then came the killing of college students at Kent State
in May 1970 followed by the re-election of Nixon. Nightly television
highlighted the bloody battles of Vietnam. Massive protests continued.
So in August 1973, Little and Mike Bortin, along with their radical
Black Power cohorts Willie Wolfe and Donald DeFreeze (who recently
escaped from prison), joined together to fight a government they considered
hijacked by a bunch of warmongering, power-hungry, right-wing criminals.
Their only plan was to shake things up, which began with murdering
a black school superintendent in Oakland, California, Marcus Foster,
who they thought was part of a racist cop conspiracy. Foster was in
fact a well-respected member of the community who was admired by students
and parents alike. Little was arrested along with Joe Remiro after
being stopped by police with SLA paraphernalia in the car. No one
had ever heard of the SLA, and the police had nothing else to go on.
The other members
of the SLA then decide to kidnap the daughter of right-wing publishing
magnate William Randolph Hearst Jr., and in early February 1974 they
kidnap Patty Hearst, leaving her fiancé beaten. Here the media
frenzy really begins. No one knows anything about the SLA. No one
knows where Patty Hearst is or what the SLA wants. So reporters start
camping out in front of the Hearst mansion, where it is not long before
regular broadcasts are made, including statements from Patty’s
fiancé and parents.
The SLA takes
advantage of the media frenzy and demands that lengthy statements
be disseminated in the press. “Death to the fascist insect that
preys upon the life of the people!” is their motto. In the image
of Robin Hood, they demand that Hearst use his fortunes to feed the
poor in California. With far less than the $300 million demanded by
the SLA, Hearst does indeed organize a program to distribute food
but the process results in mayhem in San Francisco. About two months
later, Patty Hearst announces that she has joined the SLA and is now
Tania. Less than two weeks later, she robs a bank with other SLA members.
Two bystanders are shot. The bank security camera footage of Tania
brandishing a gun is shown over and over on the nightly news. The
next month, six members of the SLA die in a shoot out with about 500
officers of the Los Angeles Police Department. The entire assault
is broadcast live on television with reporters scurrying behind cars
to avoid gunfire. Subsequent crimes of the SLA are followed closely
by the media. Patty Hearst and three SLA members are arrested in San
Francisco. Hearst is found guilty of bank robbery.
Neverland
showcases reporting sensational events plain and simple. Statements
from the Hearst family and friends, the SLA and Patty Hearst herself
were broadcast as the events happened, without spin. References in
the documentary to Robin Hood or Che and even the final televised
interview of Patty Hearst on a talk show serve to present the Zeitgeist
surrounding the Vietnam war era. Compared to Control Room,
Neverland reveals journalism for what it used to be, while
Control Room shows just how news today can be manipulated.
Both films are well worth seeing.
Perhaps
another way the documentary style can be used to manipulate rather
than just present facts is the collage documentary Freedom2Speak
V2.0, wherein a group of German directors collect opinions
and ideas of people in the film industry about American foreign policy
after 9/11. The central idea arose during the Berlinale 2003 as the
crises between the U.S. and Iraq deepened. A Speaker’s Corner
was set up, and several camera crews fanned out among festival goers.
Over the course of twelve days, more than 100 people were interviewed,
and interviews conducted at the Speaker’s Corner were streamed
onto a monitor in real time and shown to the public on www.freedom2speak.net.
After compiling a 70-minute documentary entitled f2s-berlinale that
aired on German television, directors Markus C.M. Schmidt,
Christoph Gampl, Brigitte Kramer,
Marc Meyer and Uwe Nagel pieced
together more than fifty interviews and twelve freestyle short films
for V2.0, this 60-minute film.
A unique feature
of this film is that anyone can log on the freedom2speak.net
website, watch the interviews and shorts, and edit the film however
they want. Look at comments from Dustin Hoffman, John Hurt, Minnie
Driver or Luc Picard; if you don’t like what you hear, edit
it for your own copy. Insert your own opinions as well. Regardless
of how the information was compiled, there is no question that this
film is a voice for peace and rally against the forces of war. Click
online and speak out or order the video.
Another look
at the use of documentary style is Go Further,
a film by Robert Mann of a bike tour along the Pacific
Coast Highway in California by Woody Harrelson. Harrelson is convinced
that social change is always the result of an individual’s effort.
He hires a bus that runs on hemp oil and assembles an eclectic group
of friends to bicycle and support him as he tries to raise environmental
awareness along the way. Harrelson’s companions include a yoga
teacher (Jessica Chung), a raw food chef (Renee Loux Underkoffler),
a hemp-activist (Joe Hickey), a junk-food addict and flirt (Steve
Clark), a lawyer (Tom Ballanco), a website manager (Laura Louie of
www.voiceyourself.com),
a bar fly (Sonia Farrell) and a college student who is picked up on
campus by Steve and joins the group. Joe Lewis, who Harrelson met
while filming White Men Can’t Jump, is the driver.
While
Underkoffler cooks up luscious raw meals including a chocolate avocado
mousse (Harrelson co-published her book Living Cuisine: The Art
and Spirit of Raw Foods), Clark sneaks off to the local supermarket
for chips and cigarettes. Along the road they stop at a small paper
company that makes paper out of hemp instead of trees and at a farm
where worms and manure are used to create a fertilizer for organic
farming. Not everyone is open to the concept. A woman views the upside-down
American flag on one of the bicycles as unpatriotic and as a total
block to listening to anything they have to say. Security guards keep
the group away from a manufacturing plant. Perhaps the most compelling
parts of the film are where Harrelson connects with those along the
way either by teaching an impromptu yoga class, speaking passionately
on environmental issues or giving a prepared speech to a crowd. He’s
well-informed and practical about how individuals can indeed make
a difference. Some credibility of the film is lost, however, in the
emphasis on Clark and his quest for junk food and girls. He’s
funny smoking pot and in his incredulity over milk being full of blood
and pus, but if environmental problems are ever going to be seriously
addressed by the mainstream where changes can happen on a more global
scale, the serious issues need to be removed from the image of pot-smoking
hippies. But for the high school and college crowd, such a documentary
film can be a very powerful teacher. (MW)
One
of the funnier films at the Berlinale was the U.S. documentary The
Yes Men, which follows the antics of a group of political
activists who impersonate the World Trade Organization (WTO). The
Yes Men started by creating the bogus website gwbush.org
during George W. Bush’s 2000 election campaign. They quickly
moved on to bigger and better things by creating the gatt.org
website, which many groups mistook for the WTO’s website. Soon,
they were receiving invitations to international conferences (in Austria
and Finland) and even television programs (CNBC Marketwrap Europe)
to speak on behalf of the WTO. They attended these events posing as
WTO representatives, but instead of talking about real policies, they
lectured on such ideas as selling votes to the highest corporate bidder,
allowing countries to commit human rights abuses with a system of
“justice vouchers”, and even combating widespread hunger
by making the poor eat “recycled” hamburgers. The film
does a great job of showing activists “on the front lines”
while making a strong case for their ideological viewpoints, plus
its often very funny subject matter was a welcome relief from all
of the heavy films shown at the festival. (KG)
Death
in Gaza is another impressive documentary film about
today’s politics, and not just because the cameraman died in
the line of duty. James Miller and Saira
Shah go to Gaza, that Egyptian city full of Palestinian refugees
and controlled by Israel. They follow the lives of three children:
12-year-olds Ahmed and Mohammed and teenager Nailja. Ahmed watches
as a friend is shot dead by an Israeli sniper. He turns to his neighborhood
paramilitary group and becomes their lookout and general water boy.
Mohammed’s mother cringes when he says that he wishes to die
as a martyr. Nailja has attended many funerals of close relatives.
Each day on the way to school the three children observe Israeli soldiers
and their allies, Bedouin Arabs, pull down houses and bulldoze wide
strips of land to create a no-man’s land just a few feet away.
The filmmakers visit masked terrorists who have no qualms about using
small boys for their wars, indoctrinating them with the will to become
suicide bombers. Each dead boy’s photo is plastered on the public
walls. His corpse is carried through the streets. The martyr public
relations department is alive and well. Miller and his crew visit
Nailja and her family. During the day they “exchange pleasantries”
with the Israeli soldiers patrolling just a few feet from Nailja’s
house. Around 11 p.m. they decide to return to their hotel. Carrying
a white flag, they call out to the soldiers that they are leaving
the area. On their way out 34-year-old Miller is shot in the neck
between his helmet and bullet proof vest and dies on the spot. So
far no one has accounted for the deed. The family has called for a
full and proper investigation. The Palestinian paramilitaries celebrated
him as a martyr and painted his name and dates on their walls, too.
In his short life of 34 years he won recognition for Beneath the
Veil and Unholy War, both films about Afghanistan.
Compared
to these other excellent films, the all-women Texas-Kabul
seems lightweight. German director Helga Reidemeister
interviewed Arundhati Roy, a best-selling novelist, on conflicts with
Muslims in India. She talked to Stascha Zajovic, who founded the Women
in Black in Belgrade. Every eleventh day of each month these women
demonstrate to remind people of loved-ones lost under the Milosovic
rule. Jamila Muhajed publishes the only women’s magazine in
Afghanistan. Sissy Farenthold is from Texas, 76 years old, and a former
law professor and politician. She works for worldwide human rights.
These women speak into the camera, almost by rote, which may well
be the case, considering that they must have been interviewed hundreds
of times. Their words about suffering and injustice come across as
clichés, even after their statements are underlined by real
pictures of desperately disadvantaged people in India or Serbia and
Afghanistan. What could have been a powerful film is not, unfortunately.
(BT)